Post by account_disabled on Jan 31, 2024 14:24:06 GMT 5.5
The overload of judicial activity in Brazil is undeniable, at all levels. The so-called “judicialization of private life” is another phenomenon that does not contribute to the exercise of quick and effective justice. The result arises, on the one hand, in the overcrowding of courts and judicial sections and the consequent slowness of the entire system, and, on the other hand, in the constant dissatisfaction of those under jurisdiction, who are offered a late judicial service and, often precisely for this reason , ineffective. In cases involving consumer relations, this reality presents itself in a very perverse way.
Despite the great advances in Brazilian Buy Phone Number List legislation, suppliers insist on commercial practices that are incompatible with legal guidelines, which prioritize the protection of vulnerable consumers. The endless chains of suppliers, the impersonalization of service provision (especially after-sales), the failure to comply with quality and safety standards required by law are just some of the frequent situations that result in constant and daily violations of consumer rights. Unable to resolve their problems and guarantee their interests and rights directly with suppliers, consumers have no alternative but to go to court.
This, however, does not appear to be a very encouraging option. As a rule, it consumes too much time and resources, which are not compatible with the consumer's economic interest, often to a small extent. The experience of the Special Courts, which in theory, given the free and non-requirement of representation by a lawyer, would offer a solution without bureaucracy, therefore faster, and focused on conciliation, did not prove to be sufficiently efficient in practice. Here too, excessive actions brought slowness and inefficiency to the system. The alternative of collective actions encounters great difficulties, especially when, for example, the Judiciary itself, in consolidated decisions, makes abstract control of abusive clauses unfeasible [1] .
Despite the great advances in Brazilian Buy Phone Number List legislation, suppliers insist on commercial practices that are incompatible with legal guidelines, which prioritize the protection of vulnerable consumers. The endless chains of suppliers, the impersonalization of service provision (especially after-sales), the failure to comply with quality and safety standards required by law are just some of the frequent situations that result in constant and daily violations of consumer rights. Unable to resolve their problems and guarantee their interests and rights directly with suppliers, consumers have no alternative but to go to court.
This, however, does not appear to be a very encouraging option. As a rule, it consumes too much time and resources, which are not compatible with the consumer's economic interest, often to a small extent. The experience of the Special Courts, which in theory, given the free and non-requirement of representation by a lawyer, would offer a solution without bureaucracy, therefore faster, and focused on conciliation, did not prove to be sufficiently efficient in practice. Here too, excessive actions brought slowness and inefficiency to the system. The alternative of collective actions encounters great difficulties, especially when, for example, the Judiciary itself, in consolidated decisions, makes abstract control of abusive clauses unfeasible [1] .